InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 177
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/10/2011

Re: Bulldog2 post# 12979

Thursday, 01/19/2012 12:12:40 AM

Thursday, January 19, 2012 12:12:40 AM

Post# of 80868
Personally, I appreciate some of Codie's posts just like I appreciate some of Odessa's posts. I don't like all of them but they're the two extremes and they balance each other out. The board needs them both. Hope for the best plan for the worst. Odessa's posts give me hope for MSLP, Codie's posts help me plan for the worst.

I'm with Codie on this issue, MSLP needs to address it quickly so they don't run into any troubles with NSF. I think NSF is one of the main reasons that assault does so well. But on the other side, I don't think we have to worry about MSLP putting illegal substances in their products. On both Assault and Combat powder (and I'm sure all their products, I can only confirm the 2 I have) it says manufactured in a cGMP and NSF certified facility right next to the barcode. According to the questions answered by NSF, when the products are manufactured in such a facility, the maker is allowed to use the cGMP marker but the NSF logo cannot be used unless that product is specifically approved with NSF. I don't believe a lawsuit will arise out of this since illegal substances should not be in the products but I do think a problem could arise from NSF having issues with MSLP and that's where I have issues because I feel NSF is where MSLP's products get their credibility.