InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 486
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/05/2010

Re: nobody12378 post# 24019

Wednesday, 01/18/2012 12:19:00 PM

Wednesday, January 18, 2012 12:19:00 PM

Post# of 52845
It really is interesting to ponder.

Clearly, the industry penetration is a metric Greenshift uses often. We see it in all the filings. In the filings it is clear that the percent of the industry they claim can be tied to licensed gallons. Then we have the 21st century PR where they do not specifically state "licensed" usage. why?


my thoughts...
1. If this ad is targeted to future GERS customers, then i think they would not want to overstate their customer base to thier future customers. Honesty and integrity of the provider are a big part of a due diligence process for new technology. A potential new customer might find it kinda sleazy that you publicly state its your technology others are using before its been proven.

2. If this ad is in anyway targeted to solicit financing or to institutional investors, accredited investors then they BETTER NOT state 30% unless they have it licensed or until infringement is proven in a court.

3. Does GERS think they can legally make a statement of 30% of the industry if it was still a matter for the courts to decide? Would they really want the risk of what could be seen as making false or misleading statements?

Im leaning toward thinking they've got the 30% licensed/settled. Bold statement if they don't. We'll see. Either way, the company is making great strides.