Corrections:
1. I don't recall ever stating that TAG (Z) was wholly owned or controlled by LLSR?.... But.... it sure helps when the CEO of TAG (Z) is a board member and material shareholder of LLSR... wouldn't you say? I'd say it is a very low risk that the "majority 51% owner" (TAG Z) will make a material decision against the wishes of LLSR as they are tied together.
2. Continue to encourage you to find Zimbabwe resources..... it's right there.... 51%/49%.... would send you the tangible details but I pay for the service and so can you.
3. Let me rephrase the risk of having native owned companies in third world countries....as it appears that it does not matter .... you dislike Zimbabwe/LLSR regardless and you are welcome to your opinion..... if we used your concerns as to why anyone would do business in Zimbabwe... then perhaps tier 1 USA corporations along with the international community should not invest in Libya, Iraq, Iran, Yemen, Somalia, Chad, Sudan, Congo, Sierra Leone, Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan....is this still an important topic?..... LLSR is an early adopter in Zimbabwe and although there is political concern heading into the 2012 election there.... it sure helps for the US Embassy of Zimbabwe to publicly state that "Zimbabwe is open for USA business" and the recent lifting of the diamond ban sure helps minimize the risk.
These and many more are the reasons they call me the,
Warrior of Wisdom
AI
