Here it is again but you can't seem to wrap your brain around the practical, logical views. It all has to be, "just because."
Cen-1 did not do the first pump. They did not have a reason to. They were owed money by David Saltrelli and Peter Schuster and they have to be paid on the loan. They had not converted the shares until the end of August. The first pump was in March. David and Peter did it to lure investors into NSL for their own benefit. Who else would have done it????
The second pump was done on August 1. Right at the same time David Saltrelli was trying to convince Cen-1 to convert the loan to shares. David Saltrelli pumped the second time to show Cen-1 that a conversion would be worth their while. The conversion to shares did not happen until the end of August. Over three weeks after the pump. Highly doubt Cen-1 would pump it to bring the share price down. It would have gone down on it’s own as it has.
Pump and dump the ticker to change the association of the company as a pump and dump. He can pump it as a different company. To apply more rationale to that, he changed the company from a shell company on the 25 of July which is right around the same time as the ticker change to wash his hands from the whole association from the pumping. With practical, logical, factual information, Cen-1 didn't have anything to do with the ticker change or changing it from a shell company so what does that possibly have to do with Cen-1 at all? It doesn't so that view certainly doesn't fly at all. David Saltrelli had everything to do with the ticker and shell company change.
David Saltrelli promised investors of several business strategies to make the company more visible which in turn caused current investors to invest more in hopes to cost average down their initial investment and to accrue potential investors.
