InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 91
Posts 8186
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/29/2004

Re: None

Friday, 01/13/2012 9:18:31 AM

Friday, January 13, 2012 9:18:31 AM

Post# of 312030
Question: How did the U.S. Gov't bring down, lock up, one of this countries most notorious violent killers??? Tax evasion. Al Capone went to Alcatraz for tax evasion. No. They didn't try to convict him of murdering hundreds of people. They picked him up over tax evasion.

POINT: The sec isn't even going to bother wasting time trying to prove whether or not this cow can jump over the moon, as so eloquently stated in the article written by you know who. NOPE>

They are going to drain this company dry of cash via the egotistical manner of the CEO, you know who. Who refuses to step down as a condition of settlement. NOoooo. His ego as clearly stated in his response to the sec suit. He's prepared to spend YOUR last nickel defending HIS criminal activity.

So now. As I read this thread, which by the way. Is hysterical entertainment. I'm astonished that people will defend someone who clearly as per the phone conversations text. Indicate an attempt to deceive people to obtain funding. That once that funding was secured ONLY THEN did they restate and went opppsss.

Ahhhh. This reminds me so much of the diamond scam. Oh there were those who said, I saw the diamonds, I met him at the drag races, I this I that. And down to the very end were still defending someone who took their money via deception.

One more point. "Perception" word of the day. If you see a man remove his sport coat and strapped to him is a holster on both sides of his chest with two guns in them. Would you not think he is carrying a concealed weapon fully loaded and ready to kill? Thats the normal perception. But what if they were merely squirt guns only filled with deadly water??? The deception.


Hmmmmm. Is JBII truly what it appears to be?

I'm not trying to "Save" anyone. No am I shorting this stock. It does trouble me when I see people whom are not being objective about "Facts". I'm slowly working my way through the article that caused so much of a rucus here, determining if each statement made is factual or if the guys blowing smoke up everyones arse. To be honest so far everything he wrote is proving to be factual. I've yet to find a statement made in it that can't be backed up with facts.

Good luck to the "Long and Strong". I sure hopr for your finacial sake your correct.

Of course all of this is strictly my "opinion".