California Grapes International, Inc (CAGR)

[StevenW]

Here is what took the wind out of the sails for me regarding Marble. Yes, it would be great to get more eyes on the company, but I don't want it to be done in a similar fashion that PSC brought eyes to the company (aka pump). I'd much rather have the company's real success and financial gains be the light that attracts new investors.

But mainly, if, indeed we are going to attract new and/or large institutional investors, why was the statement made that they will very likely issue additional shares in the future? Surely, no institutional investor will want to invest in a company that stated themselves they foresee diluting investors. Of course the other option is CAGR issues more restricted shares at a price far below current price to entice investors, which still hurts the common shareholder.

It was not a trick question and I was very glad someone had Frank answer.