InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 32
Posts 3586
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/02/2004

Re: GWMAN post# 156404

Thursday, 01/12/2012 6:48:59 PM

Thursday, January 12, 2012 6:48:59 PM

Post# of 312016
It's called "credibility".

1. You say you can achieve something within parameters you define
2. You achieve it
3. You have credibility and people believe your next claim

1. You say you can achieve something within parameters you define
2. You do not achieve it
3. You have seriously limited your capacity to move ahead with # 3 above

This is the JBII issue. Obviously as a long, you tend towards the first model of credibility.

As obviously, the discrepancy between JBII's claims and the current PPS shows that many people tend towards model # 2.

If model # 1 was as clear cut as many zealots here claim, the PPS would not be hovering around a buck and PIPES at .80 would not be necessary.

Either large investors don't believe in the process, or large investors don't believe in JB himself.

Time will tell, but as the months peel away, model # 2 gains more and more traction.

Simple question: Is there a P2O machine up and running 24/7 in Niagra generating revenue right now? If so, how much?

If not, see model # 2 above