InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 511
Posts 59579
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 12/21/2009

Re: Millenium323 post# 166

Wednesday, 01/11/2012 12:19:43 PM

Wednesday, January 11, 2012 12:19:43 PM

Post# of 335
They filed a 15-12G so they would NOT have to file.......then bought NYTEX "supposedly" after the filing, but 2 months AFTER they changed the name of UAMA in FL......wtfreak?

I think the process became more difficult and frustrating then they had envisioned. They apparently were going back and forth with FINRA over information requirements, the name change, and also had 3 years of filings to get up to date with the UAMA shell.



The CEO could have very plainly explained to UAMA shareholders what happened to their assets, even in a PR. Of course LEGALLY he doesn't have to since THEY DO NOT FILE!

At some point NYTEX will have to be declared for TLPH to remain current. Will it be disclosed how a FL corp became a NY corp? Of course the NY corp has existed since 2008, and was never moved to FL in the first place, now was it?

Now if folks believe UAMA will receive 20 million TLPH shares, shouldn't we see a Form 3 filed listing UAMA as a beneficial owner?

good luck











As Always: My Number 1 Priority is to educate. Penny stocks are very volatile, Always do your own Due Diligence

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.