InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 24
Posts 10743
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 08/02/2010

Re: big gttom post# 22087

Tuesday, 01/10/2012 1:15:14 AM

Tuesday, January 10, 2012 1:15:14 AM

Post# of 42999

Sorry. Mere words.


The reality is that EL 14/2009 does not have coal seam gas rights as another poster assumed to be the case. The clarification is well worth making as it is undesirable for demonstrably incorrect claims that could mislead investors and readers of the board to go unchallenged.


That is, if I was authorized to drill in a virgin basin looking for oil and I just so happened to strike gold, well geez, I for one am keeping it! Less of course, any shares owed to others.

I'd say Malcolm agrees with me on this.
As well as counsel, the respectable Paul A. Batiste pc


GSLM would not get to "keep" the gold without holding a Category 1 exploration licence (EL 14/2009 is Category 4) or a mining lease. Malcolm is so erratic in his actions he well may wish to "keep" the gold and even sue MRT for it, however, if New York counsel Mr Paul Batista Esq. were to read the Tasmanian Mineral Resources Development Act he would learn that GSLM did not have a right to the lucky gold strike.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.