I am sorry, you and I appear to be talking about two separate things. What I am referring to is the allegations made on this board by numerous posters that no attorney can work with Williams. See Dear Slayer post 53535, Hot post 53536, and Sosa's veiled statement that there are hundreds of rude e-mails from Williams that prove without a shadow of a doubt that he is impossible to work with. These allegations are repeated like religious dogma. The source, no doubt, is Pierce and Turrini.
However, the fact is that as long as you are doing your job, not looking to do the easy thing rather than the right thing, not looking to violate your fiduciary and legal duties, then Williams is just a gruff bastard, but he is not impossible to work with. The proof of this is in the current Delaware litigation.
I am really not sure what you are referring to as far as the contingency attorney goes. I was talking about the T-Mobile case. If Williams can work with this attorney (as well as the one in California), then he will be able to work with the T-Mobile contingency attorney.
