InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,447.87
(
-0.31%
)
US TECH 100
18,982.40
(
-1.17%
)
Dow Jones
39,411.21
(
0.67%
)
Brent Oil
85.26
(
-0.02%
)
Bitcoin
61,342.38
(
1.79%
)
Post# of 60937
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Cougar6

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 5
Posts 2099
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/04/2007

Cougar6

Re: longhorn 53 post# 53563

Friday, 01/06/2012 5:02:02 PM

Friday, January 06, 2012 5:02:02 PM

Post# of 60937
That is correct. The allegation is that no lawyer can or will work with Williams. If that allegation were accurate, then he could not have brought the case in Delaware since it required him to successfully work with an attorney. The fact that an attorney is currently representing him in Delaware is proof on its face that he can work with attorneys. If he were bringing the case pro se, then you could make the argument that he cannot work with attorneys.

In fact, Williams is still working with his California attorney, which is more than I can say for management.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up