InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 205
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/20/2006

Re: Hammer1 post# 35227

Thursday, 01/05/2012 10:43:43 PM

Thursday, January 05, 2012 10:43:43 PM

Post# of 37776
Then why keep him around as the attorney? If he truly has nothing to do with the company and owns no shares, why not get rid of the guy based on his reputation? Certainly there are a million lawyers with better bar records and reputations. The only reason to keep him around would be that he still has some involvement.

BTW will the new company make good on the promised dividend which was never delivered to shareholders??