my seniority comment was mainly regarding how tps has more leverage as for as the 70/30.was concerned and bring the split to more favorable.terms.
I do.agree, that dimeq may take the majority of that 30% (subject to any change in percentage) and commons lose out because of.the dimeq ruling. as for.the ec, I really don't think.they care as much because of their post bk employment. plus, I wouldn't be surprised if they were" awarded" more common shares as compensation. heck, if I was them, I would probably do.the same. ha ha j.k.
as to the nols, they belong to the company, not shareholders. as to the change in ownership re: nols, there are two sets of nols with one tied to onwership change and the other is "loosely" tied. ec is going after nols that are loosely tied and unresticted. so a significant amount of. nols are.still available.
imo
