InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 2099
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/04/2007

Re: THE_BAMFACTSTER!! post# 53462

Thursday, 01/05/2012 8:19:19 AM

Thursday, January 05, 2012 8:19:19 AM

Post# of 60937
I interpret the events of that period differently. When Diac tried to sell the patent Turrini did not seem to be fighting. He did not even appear to be engaged. He looked like he was doing the same thing he did when Diac won the default in court that led to him receiving the $117M judgment.

You claim that:

which he gave back to Turrini after he thought he was going to lose to Drago



But what happened was that once Williams got the TRO and it was clear there was going to be a fight, Turrini stepped forward and did nothing more than what he was required to do as the CEO of the company, he worked with the attorney to put together a case.

The difference of opinion about the case dealt with discovery. Williams wanted to depose Diac's wife who was on the board regarding how she was acting regarding potential deals. For whatever reason Turrini did not like this idea and felt that his testimony alone could win the case. Apparently later he had reservations about that idea and chose a path that would never put him on the stand.

I am not saying that a settlement was a bad idea. What I am saying is that it became necessary because management would not make the effort to mount a serious case. Because of that, we had to settle.



Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.