Protest

[gotmilk]

JohnII,

Can you also send these remarks to JB and see what he says.

While it is true that 'dissenter's rights' were offered to any BORK shareholder who chose to exercise them at the time, the activity of Bourque Industries board to actualize that event was done with full knowledge and deliberation that $0.054 a share was not in the interest of shareholders when a far greater amount of cash could be obtained using a private placement method while BORK was over $2 and expected by Bourque Industries board to reach higher levels based on their acknowedged in public that this company will do great things in the very near future of a few years. Thusly they violationed their fiduciary duties to protect shareholder value, an act that preceded the merger as the act to create such a merger that removed from the company an ability to obtain a far greater cash return for shares mentioned at issue. Add to that the fact that most members of Bourque Industries board were the major recipient of obtaining those shares at near zero cost, and you have intent.

Thanks,
Doug