If one was Walsh and another being Williams, and not knowing the rest of committee's makeup that, I have to think this was a power play by Williams to try to not even have the vote for fear he might find out how shareholders really feel about him. I, if all other shareholders are willing to also, propose that we ask Williams to participate without challenge in another vote for his removal and to live or die with the results. I think it's a good way for the shareholders who did not vote the last time to show their support for him this time. I really wish this unlikely scenario would happen, then I could truly know if the majority believes like I, that he is the problem.
