InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,460.48
(
-0.41%
)
US TECH 100
19,181.20
(
-0.43%
)
Dow Jones
39,118.86
(
-0.12%
)
Brent Oil
84.85
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
60,674.85
(
0.60%
)
Post# of 60937
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Cougar6

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 5
Posts 2099
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/04/2007

Cougar6

Re: None

Sunday, 01/01/2012 11:43:41 AM

Sunday, January 01, 2012 11:43:41 AM

Post# of 60937
We already know the settlement is not as represented. If it were, and all previous agreements were void as is represented in the press release, then Diac and Williamson would be required to return the shares given to them as part of the 2008 agreement. Per discussions at the forum they are not required to do so The question is, what else is in the document that is not as represented?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up