Plan tied to DIMEQ opinion-I say this is over lock/stock & barrel!
This Judge has never wanted to rule on DIMEQ and has hated TPS because any remotely correct ruling had to be in the favor of DIMEQ/TPS which goes against this Judge’s Government bosses. Never, has this Judge broadcast WHEN she was going to make a ruling other than to say ASAP and “are we done yet?” This court has said (past Thursday) she will have a ruling by this Tuesday which would mean today, Sunday or Monday. aThis leaves absolutely no time for people to decipher, understand, research and make professional objections that are due on 1/4/2012. Nobody has even remotely said anything or complained about this time span unless it does not matter.
Anytime there is a major opinion affecting a case such as this, there must be adequate time given and there is not. Normally, when there is not enough time or the legal team wants to shorten the time for a response, this would require a filing. Yet, nobody has said anything about DIMEQ’s ruling coming on 1/3/2012/ with objections due on 1/4/2012 for the Disclosure Staement Hearing and I find this very strange unless this is all done. This would also explain why Susman had agreed to a plan before the DIMEQ decision which on the surface appears as a sell-out and I am not buying that, YET!
• We have no time from DIMEQ opinion to objections due on Disclosure Statement Hearing
• The EC making a deal that on the surface appears to be a sell-out
• EC said we will have Q & A’s out and still nothing
• The court broadcasts when she WILL have DIMEQ ruling
• Recently filed TPS objections making their case for a stay pending their appeal
• Very little sense to be made of new plan or just a diversion pending REAL deal
