InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 41
Posts 12861
Boards Moderated 23
Alias Born 04/16/2001

Re: Alvie post# 9325

Friday, 12/30/2011 11:36:28 PM

Friday, December 30, 2011 11:36:28 PM

Post# of 28677
re: "[not] to reveal or make public."

I'm very confident that inside the very near future, as in months, the performance of the plasma spray testing will on its own merits attract the attention of those people that already have a very successful history of investing into new startup companies and supply as much cash, as quickly as needed, to take them where the history of extremely valuable companies list them as the very few.

Unlike today's wealthy internet companies like Facebook and Google that relied on being the first at the right time to advance a product line that taps into social behavior and gets revenue from eyeballs on advertizing, our company actually has a real product that doesn't need a certain mood of people to find valuable, and can't be produced in a copycat manner like internet search engines and just another place on the web for people to hang out with others.

It would be extremely sad and uncalled for if Bourque Industries did something stupid that sent a signal that the board is sleezy and thusly can't be trusted, as that places a possibility that Bourque Industries can be held hostage and prevented from moving towards great success with simple lawsuits initiated by a few shareholders more interested in hurting this company than trying to obtain a return on their investment, which may be very small, but their pride and honor to be treated fairly took a hit.

If those interested in helping this company find questionable text in the 09/29/2011 "Bourque Industries Makes Key Strategic Acquisitions to..." release, as follows:

If,

"Kryron Global [holds] all Kryron-related patents before the merger"

Then,

"[to] acquire [companies] each of which hold certain pre-existing license rights to Kryron technology."

It would seem unnecessary to acquire the other two companies when acquiring "all Kryron-related patents" from Kryron Global in itself consolidates all facets of Kryron technology into a single corporate entity that includes all sales, distribution, manufacturing, and future product development since the Kryron patents holds all licensing rights.

I find it amazing and troubling that feedback to this board does not include comments from any Bourque Industries board members, especially from the legal team.

Be certain those that have the ability to help this company will ask these questions since they have many very experienced lawyers looking for things that can cause a monkey wrench to be thrown into the gears, especially when its very easy to initiate a valid lawsuit.

Once again, this company has the real goods, and it would be sad if each of the board members used smoke & mirrors to acquire huge amounts of shares for their own ownership thinking not one shareholder will question having the attitude and means to take action to challenge it.

All I'm asking is for John Bourque to release an updated version of the 09/29/2011 "Bourque Industries Makes Key Strategic Acquisitions to..." that supplies enough details with valid reasoning on the decisions made that justifies a value for value transfer.

Its all simply has focus on the following text.

"Kryron Global [holds] all Kryron-related patents before the merger"

If the other two companies brang a value equal to the price we payed for them, then why have those details not simply be presented on this board weeks ago after I first posted about them and halted any further posts by me on this.

Perhaps John Bourque or his legal team can relay a simply message to this board that the future financials being reported will supply all details as evidence to prove that the other two companies held critical values that Bourque Industries needed, that without them Bourque Industries could not fully function and Bourque Industries could not obtain them elsewhere, or if it could the cost would be the same.

Big new investment cash Bourque Industries needs will look at this, and if they see any chance of legal issues down the road they will ask for them to be eliminated first.

Best be sure that any hint of real legal issues will tank the BORK price, and while it may seem a great opportunity to average down, plan on five plus years until it is resolved and hope other alloy breakthroughs are not accomplished by other companies is false hope as they will and make Bourque Industries a note in the business history as a failure.

Doug