Followers | 26 |
Posts | 1423 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 08/03/2010 |
Thursday, December 29, 2011 11:21:38 AM
...but Epic's assertion of their distribution deal vs. Mr. Brennan's statement from today is the sort of discrepancy that might foreshadow litigation.
I'm long here, many shares, and I've only sold enough to protect my initial capital, but lawsuits kill micro-caps and given today's PR, news of pending litigation would not surprise me. I'm not saying it will happen, only that such a difference of statements between these companies says that one or both parties may have failed to properly communicate the terms, or some loose ends may have been left hanging in a way that requires lawyers to sort them out.
I hope that's not the case, but the company has had many months to refute the terms put forth by Epic. Ideally we have terminated the agreement because more attractive terms are now available elsewhere, but we can't know that at this time.
I will retain copy of this posting for future review, in case someone decides it's off-topic.
FEATURED ECGI Holdings Enhances Board with Artificial Intelligence (AI) Expert Ahead of Allon Apparel Launch • Jul 10, 2024 8:30 AM
Avant Technologies to Meet Unmet Needs in AI Industry While Addressing Sustainability Concerns • AVAI • Jul 10, 2024 8:00 AM
Panther Minerals Inc. Launches Investor Connect AI Chatbot for Enhanced Investor Engagement and Lead Generation • PURR • Jul 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Glidelogic Corp. Becomes TikTok Shop Partner, Opening a New Chapter in E-commerce Services • GDLG • Jul 5, 2024 7:09 AM
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM