InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 3893
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/28/2005

Re: INET6 post# 3163

Tuesday, 07/19/2005 1:24:39 PM

Tuesday, July 19, 2005 1:24:39 PM

Post# of 45771
INET6,

"I believe we all agree that,at takeover, CDEX ended up with nothing workable enough to market."

I don't agree with that. I remember loch/CDEX claiming near 100% accuracy of the EM-1 in several published reports. At the inception of CDEX, I remember MP stating that there were no known obstacles left to overcome in the development of the EM-1.

I remember a mock-up production model of a UV-based, PSSS which MP claimed they would start selling in Janurary, 2003. The campaign appears to have been abandoned assumming that that was ever their true intent.

Do you believe that there was no deception involved on MP's part?

I believe that we can all agree that there was and that it continues today.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.