Dime Bancorp Inc (fka DIMEQ)

[fbrutus]

Yes thanks it looks good.
I love this:

Even if the language in 510(b) was ambiguous, equitable
concerns weigh against subordinating Tranquility’s claim.
Tranquility did not purchase a security of the Debtors and did
not assume the risk (and potential rewards) that a shareholder of
the Debtors assumed.

And also the objection to the POR #7

A good day!