427: As I told you in PM, I will no longer argue with you privately about this company. You seem to be trying to catch me in a contradiction by saying that on one hand I take what someone posts what the company said at face value, and on the other hand, I won't believe it unless it is in a filing.
Let me just set the record straight. Several days ago, two people posted information here that was porportedly from the company. The information was that the quiet period would only last two or three days. One poster attributed that statement to Ray. At that time, I vigorously questioned the validity of those statements. I never took them at face value and you say I did. As always, I question the truthfulness of *any* statement attributed to the company that is not in a filing.
Obviously these statements "from the company" were wrong. That leaves two options - 1) The company lied to the two people who posted the information here, or 2) The posters lied of their own volition.
I find it odd that you completely ignore that fact that *someone* lied about the length of the quiet period and instead you attack me by again trying to catch me in a contradiction.
Once again, someone posted false information attributed to the company. As I have always done, I questioned the information posted, and pointed out that it was indeed false. There is no contradiction.
