InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 116
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/07/2010

Re: None

Sunday, 12/18/2011 11:33:15 AM

Sunday, December 18, 2011 11:33:15 AM

Post# of 8307
Merchant & Wall street.
Why don’t you guys knock it off and stay on the subject….

And forget the NOLS. …Not important know.

This is about getting what we deserve; the Anchor Litigation proceeds.

As an original holder of the Dime warrants of which I have added to over the years and have a substantial position I think this is a critical moment in our case. The last important point in time was when was the objection to the extinguishment of the Dime warrants, which was back in June 2010 I also filed a claim with the Bankruptcy Court in March 2009. Now we have Ratrosen (I smell a rat), inviting Steinberg, Arthur J, to mediation.

I believe, and correct me if I’m wrong, what we should do is wait for the Judge’s ruling and if not known by the deadline Jan.4, 2012 for objections to the 7th POR, then file an objection to protect our rights under the warrant agreement and most importantly protect our right to pursue a breach of fiduciary duties against the BOD. This is not in the 7th POR and if we don’t object, and the judge rules against class 12 status for DIMEQ we are screwed and can no longer appeals.
Ask yourself, why do we need to mediate at this time? Wait for a ruling and then mediate if we lose because we have that right if we object to the 7th POR.
Am I missing something here?

I don’t believe under Bankruptcy a Fiduciary duties are waived; is that correct?

I ask all you legal eagles and well informed board members for your opinions. Thanks in advance.

Tom
Ps: It’s easy enough to write an objection because they ignore all our rights under the warrant agreement it will just take 14 letters.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.