Finally some clarity on the conditions of the deal.
If SIAF had skipped repurchasing shares earlier this year at a higher price they could have saved money and they wouldn't have to involve IronRidge.
On the other hand, if they hadn't re-bought shares in the spring the price per share might have been even more depressed at that time, after selling the dairy.
I guess that about half a year ago they bet on a higher price per share now in December, so perhaps SIAF thought it would be a better deal than it turned out to be.
The only thing that would have been interesting to know is if they really reasoned as I wrote here.
Was the deal simply a bet on a higher price per share now in December combined with an effort to support the price per share through repurchase of shares in early summer?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.