InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 86
Posts 4055
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/14/2006

Re: hotmeat post# 38895

Friday, 12/16/2011 4:07:57 PM

Friday, December 16, 2011 4:07:57 PM

Post# of 42851
I doubt the EC would (can) prejudice the preferreds anymore based on the 70/30% split.

The way I look at it is there are only 2 real pools (Dimeq is #3):

Pool 1: Initially, Preferrds pool consisted on p/k only. TPS/REITS lost their battle and are in appeal, meanwhile TPS/REITS dilute p/k by more than double dilution.

Pool 2: commons.

Dimeq coming in and diluting commons pool should not be factor of reallocating the 70/30 in favor of commons. The 70/30 split is already bad enough for prefferds.

... and I agree, Dimeq prospecus is based on "commons" pool.



Commons got a great deal out of this settlement.


imo of course








Based on the dime prospectus only the commons can be diluted in the event they are classed as equity(30% to approx 9% ownership of newco shares). The prefs can only get a haircut if the ec agrees to re-jig the settlement to reduce the effect of dilution on the commons.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.