InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 1859
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/10/2010

Re: vineyardstock post# 23157

Wednesday, 12/14/2011 8:38:55 PM

Wednesday, December 14, 2011 8:38:55 PM

Post# of 52840
I'll guarantee Cardinal thinks ICM can't win the case, but they would be ten times better off to lose to GERS than to Bail on the Indemnity Contract and all the associated damages, Installations of TriCanters, Bla Bla Bla!!LOL They would live in Court till one or both of them died!! MOO

Edit: Would like to add I pretty much agree with your Post, just wanted to make the Point that Cardinal MUST think, at this point that the ICM Patent is a lost cause. You are right, in some ways, they could be better off settling. One way would be to break the agreement if ICM got final denial on their "Pending" Patent! That might give them legal standing to dump the Contract, but on the downside would leave them still owing for all the "Tricanter" and affiliated equipment that ICM put in. Then they would just have to do the Math (or as I have been "Tutored" the Arithmetic!).

Running out of Messages soon! See You!