InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 1023
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/11/2011

Re: surfguy post# 19141

Wednesday, 12/14/2011 12:29:09 PM

Wednesday, December 14, 2011 12:29:09 PM

Post# of 95633
Hey Surfguy,
Im afraid the ludicrous comment was directed at my proposal. I sure respect your opinion so i felt the need to re state a stipulation i put in on it.
I mentioned that IMO the share count per shareholder record is so far ridicously wrong it is really sending a message regarding float that plays into THIS seller and flippers hand. He could even be shorting to draw this out forever.

IF THE AMT WE ARE SAYING SHARES IS LOCKED IS ONLY 50-60% correct and very well may include this former holder from shell and merger transaction is included in the boards list as an anonymous person, which its a perfect false impression to give,,,,then it would be wise to take this individual out. Get rid of this equation of problem. Offer 10% premium on the IMO estimate of 15mil shares and thats 75k that hopefully would come not from working capitol but special arrangement. IF 75K IS OR WILL HINDER GETTING PRODUCTION WE ARE IN ONE HELL OF A MESS.
This is the only way to try and keep pps from continuing to bottom. If PPS doubles in a couple of weeks, which IMO will, from this transaction think of what is gained.. CONFIDENCE
Take care