>>It was clear from some of the documents that Diac gave the company additional loans for operating expenses that were secured by the patent.
Help me out here. How could he use the patent as collateral when its ownership has not been determined until the new, double probation secret vaporous settlement just re-announced for the fourth time? Who would enter into such a loan agreement?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.