InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 297
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/26/2004

Re: rupert post# 59412

Thursday, 07/14/2005 6:58:21 PM

Thursday, July 14, 2005 6:58:21 PM

Post# of 97574
For AMD its not about publicity.

I cannot see any settlement that would terminate Intel's business practices that would fit both sides.

As to delays well remember the federal fast-track system is in place. Judges want to see 18-month schedules.

The difference between the Microsoft antitrust case and this case is stark. for one I think AMD waited one helluva long time before filing. I do believe that this has been on the agenda since 2000 - I actually had a conversation with Tom McCoy about it around that time. AMD really waited until it saw the whites of their eyes and until they had a rock-solid case. Plus O'M&M have probably been preparing the case for 2 years+. The discovery plan may be dated 2003 and bound in Morrocan leather!

Where do you see delays measured in years?

As to relief - well the penalties are of the "shall" form so its not up to the judge or jury. 3x actual damages will be a lot of money.


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News