InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 211
Posts 22580
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 05/19/2010

Re: UpstateChris post# 64039

Wednesday, 12/07/2011 10:16:54 PM

Wednesday, December 07, 2011 10:16:54 PM

Post# of 68381
I am inclined to agree with you on what has occurred. Further support is the assignment of shares to himself just prior to the hot potato game. I don't doubt myself in thinking that he appointed new directors through Meuse. What I do not understand is why he used Meuse - only reason I can see is to fool shareholders into thinking that he sold out & that this is fresh new mining & solar games (kinda like gimu). The website update I have less problem with than you. Hey, if he's is still in then he's going to want to keep the farce alive. What other logical reason exists for him pushing what a new management would be "keeping?"

I know that Wyoming is default to unlimited shares & I realize that the 10 bil just got a modification as such. As far as majority, I have a 2 part question: Was the bogus Miami shareholder meeting (with no shareholders) a legal event permissible with Wyoming registration & why were majority shareholders not included in the alleged meeting?