I just finished reading your post 5122.......excellent and informative, thanks for sharing,,,,,,,,,,now regarding the other posting.......lol....
I dont want to argue on this subject or even debate it really. I already know we agree on about 95% regarding fecof. It could be that my perception of the wording of what was said is different than the perception of what you read. Or maybe i used the wrong description or wording,,,,but anyway....
we are in agreement about vague or general dates given..........they never used the term "release date".....that is simply the term that i decided to use to explain when we wil be given a summary of what they discovered in OUR company.........they gave general time frames......"end of this quarter".etc......one even said years later and people on this board wondered if its a misquote...
i could search online later to show you the quote that i understood in that way, but it wont reaaly matter if its perception that divides our opinion,,,,
"Made up? making up?" ,,,,No you would be very wrong to judge me or label me as intentionally making something up. At worst I could be wrong or there is a misreading or misunderstanding but I dont think I did. Consider yourself possibly being the one who is wrong as well.
If there is intentional misleading of information it would be from Fecof in regards the way they handled the gold mine, and lack of informing us, even if its FEP that i'm waiting on ,we are still talking about the same cronies running the show.They are all on multiple boards with these companies.
you said: "Not only is that unrealistic... it's wildly unrealistic... and it would be stupid of them to "give the data to the shareholders". No company in their right mind would do that. Why you'd say that you expect it ? Hmmm. "
Very dramatic wording there.....my response: I am a shareholder of nidof as well...very small but nonetheless, they told their shareholders what they were drilling to recover before doing so, and when they ran into "water" they closed it up and explained in summary details the problems they ran into and the reason for closing it up. To inform your shareholders is not "wildly unrealistic"
What do we know?? I know that a survey of about half of the sc72 area was done many years ago< as we have seen posted continuously here>, and I also know that a summary of that information was "released" and that is where we get the 3.4tc number from....so dont be quick to judge me as "Idiotic" for assuming that a summary would be expected to be released to the shareholders as well.....i never said we'd get the entire printout or 1000 page report<although if you request to see it through a lawyer you should be able to do that too>.
"And, they've already addressed some of that, too, with action"
I would disagree...theyve addressed it with words only,,,,,,a comittment of cash and words of drilling a hole is still words before the act actually happens......<but i understand what you mean to say, wink>....they can back off from their words at anytime although I'm leaning towards the hope that they wont, and carry thru on with this........because of the govts. involvement and action <both phil and US> ....not because of their words.
I had finished the post you are referring to by Conceeding that maybe in this case its a good strategy to keep that info tightlipped a little bit longer <info regarding "leads" from other sites> until after we know if theyve been awarded new contracts in their bidding.,,,,,
if it makes you feel better i will rephrase what i meant....or should have said instead
" the analysis time frame" or a "release date of that finished analysis to the company" of sc72 was expected to be completed by the 4th quarter......and I for one am crazy enough to believe that shareholders "rightfully by law" deserve to know what the end results are, and a "news release/summary following soon after" from the analysis, WHEN the information is not jeopardizing future profits from alerting competition.
this is all just my opinion..... and the loose facts that we have so far.
I will keep in mind to watch my wording or phrasing around you next time......
By the way I apreciate the links of info you sent me in private messaging but i dont have a premium account to reply back in like manner...i only have around 800,ooo shares of this
thanks and good luck
