InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 41
Posts 12874
Boards Moderated 22
Alias Born 04/16/2001

Re: KZMike post# 8694

Monday, 12/05/2011 7:48:49 PM

Monday, December 05, 2011 7:48:49 PM

Post# of 28694
re: where cost of a solid Kryron 'part' would be cost prohibitive

I couldn't agree more, and will add the obvious fact that the amount of Kryron Bourque Industries needs to produce for a surface application could be a thousand times less than any body armor plate and return the same sales cost for revenue.

Hopefully the "more details tomorrow" will include how Bourque Industries will start comparative testing of Kryron side-by-side with currently used material for surface applications.

Bourque Industries can supply the Kryron to as many independent testing labs as necessary to cover enough of the industry components to demo that we do indeed have something not only better, but much better at the same availablity and cost of current materials for surface applications.

I'm hopeful that the amount and packaging of the Kryron for this surface application method will be a task a thousand times quicker and easier than supplying the body or vehicle armor, with associated profit margins a thousand times greater than armor.

If independent labs publish great results, these findings will quickly be copied real time online to the associated industry journals, plus the material science related journals, causing the kind of buzz that will place our company into a quick growth for strong revenue very very quickly most likely in 2012.

(posted on facebook:) "Big day for Bourque Industries... very successful test [as] we now have definitive proof of concept on the surface application of Kryron on industrial materials using plasma-generated spray [to] allow cost-effective implementation of Kryron components [in] the aviation, automotive, medical device, and agriculture and heavy equipment industries, among others."

Doug

Bourque Industries www.bourqueindustries.com