Tikasun: All of them, so far. It isn't that the companies haven't had challenges and hurdles to overcome. For example, in one case, the company experienced a huge failure after spending a lot of money. A lot of it, hedge fund money.
They immediately reported the problem to shareholders and their concepts for a solution and fired the CEO and one of the directors. Hired a new CEO who brought in another $7 million in private money. They never said they were going to do something and then not do it.
They are now on course to realize the success they have been after for years.
In another case, from a 30 year old almost dormant company, a sudden change in directors, management, fund raising success and acquisitions have been reported by the company but without projections for the future except: that resource definition is being completed and gold and silver production will begin in the spring. There has not been one peep out of the company except for required filings and PR associated with the filings. The silver resource is defined and reported and the gold is under way via an update of a NI 43-101.
Believe me, I would like to say that I am as proud of my investment in DGRI as these other companies regardless of the return on investment from any of them.
We need to give some thought to the difference between arguing a point with the research group and expressing our feelings about company events, good or bad.
I really believe that the company must consider investor sentiment when dumping stock. That is why I won't sell any of my 2 million shares and I don't think anyone should sell, no mater what.
Maybe we can force the company to seek other sources of finance to keep it going. Certainly my preference.
AI
