Robo,
Even if they published a recovery rate for the work that they did so far these last 2 quarters, statistically, it wouldn't really mean much. They need to have a lot more production time to get meaningful numbers. Yes, it would be nice to see some figures, but those numbers really wouldn't give you much to plan or predict with.
If they could correlate the recovery rates to core samples and show good numbers, then it would be more meaningful, but still questionable. You need consistent production figures to establish reliable, predictive rates. The "sample" would be too small, statistically.
I suspect they are still "hunting" for the pay gravel that will produce the big returns.
JMHO
Don't take my word for it, Do your own research! Then you will know it's true!