InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 160
Posts 21357
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/22/2010

Re: Dreamchaser post# 42632

Tuesday, 11/29/2011 7:05:49 PM

Tuesday, November 29, 2011 7:05:49 PM

Post# of 113927
sgr..just got home...another shareholder meeting question if possible. my problem with generic interviews on the web is that the interview is too soft, don't probe enough. we support mmtc, don't intend to be instigators, but feel the need to ask a few "pushy" questions for transparency. i sent you one earlier, here is another..july 26,2011 epic ordered (5) mit1000 systems "for immediate delivery in a transaction valued at 200k". i emailed epic ceo tucker a while ago asking if he had received systems-he politely responded epic had not, transaction takes time and wants to do it right. understandable since he had little time from date of pr and date of my email..but four months have now passed, and i'd like to ask the same question.."Has EPIC received the (5) MIT1000 systems yet"-and if not, why not! july 26 pr did state "immediate delivery", so curious as to what "immediate " actually means. MMTC last quarterly does not show any sales, especially none from EPIC, not even a deposit fee for the five systems..my concern is the potential for the two companies to be "scratching each others back" with these pr's. sgr-tough question, but one that could be quite telling and i think should be asked if you get the opportunity. transparency is a must, and this question confronts that issue..thanks again for yourself and chartman's time! glty.