InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 43
Posts 5674
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 02/17/2006

Re: None

Tuesday, 11/29/2011 4:43:31 AM

Tuesday, November 29, 2011 4:43:31 AM

Post# of 41875
THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE

I can't even describe to you how incredibly angry this information makes me but I am glad someone is actually talking about the fraud that has been the aerospace industry for the past 50+ years. You know I've always had suspicions that things were not quite right. From my personal observation we have been at almost a standstill technologically, other than computer advancement since my birth and that things haven't progressed nearly as rapidly as they should have. Technology really should have accelerated with increasing computational capacity but we have been at a virtual standstill with energy consumption and advancement in transportation speed, capacity and method. For all practical purposes outside on your roads and in your skies it is still 1960.

Rumors of pulse jet engine technology has abounded on the fringes for years, now confirmed by recent articles talking about missiles that can hit a target anywhere in the world in 1 hr time. They (the government) are taking us all out on a huge snipe hunt and average joe still thinks that the Apollo program was a huge success for us. The real science is being buried because it would free us from fossil fuels. What they are doing to us as a society is cold, it is cruel and it is calculated.

From the article,

"What determines the L/D ratio, the Lift-to-Drag of an aircraft's aeroshell? Why were the fraud's of the Apollo program, the Shuttle program, designed with high drags and low L/Ds? Not designed aerodynamically, but rather designed with surface features and textures which would heat up and destroy the vehicles -- burn up Christa McAuliffes from here until 'Kingdom Come' (down.) Frauds designed by 'NASA von Braun' et al to re-enter ballistically in 4-5 minutes, thereby incurring ten-twenty times more heating than a 'cool-blue' Spaceplane which takes 50-100 minutes to return from orbit?"

I have long suspected that our almost WWII technology passenger jets were part of the way they keep us hooked on oil consumption. I guess it's true.

"If we use Spaceplane engines, scramjet engines or a mix of jet and rocket engines, instead we could accelerate at one gravity, 1 g, all the way. Our T/W would then equal 1, and our L/D X T/W = 17 x 1 = 17. And a fuel-cost savings factor of about 24/0.25 divided by 17 = 5.6. A fuel cost savings of 82 percent per flight." Oh and you could be basically anywhere in the world, like London to New Zealand in 2 hrs time not 24 hrs. Not only that but seriously they want us all to believe that flying over Canada and Iceland in some huge arch to reach Europe, even Southern Europe somehow is necessary for anything other than burning fuel just drives me nuts. As though using dinosaur jets isn't fuel consumption enough to keep the oil charrade humming along.

This note of his really takes you down the rabbit hole so that you can see how pervasive the manipulation of not only the aerospace industry really is but how we are being abused by a corrupt system. Even here, even NASA. It's all a huge ruse.



the SpacePlane Equation (revisited) ...
by Millennium Twain on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

THG, would you please post this on Nuclear Hubris as you know I can't.

https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=10150389674089525

One head cannot contain all wisdom.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.