I didn't say that the statement isn't deceptive; I said only that the semantic example he used to try to establish that doesn't hold water. Did someone attempt to deceive? I have no idea. Wasn't there. Is it possible that something Kakani produced before Pristine was used in medicine sold at Rite-Aid, CVS, etc? I'd imagine so.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.