InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 2099
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/04/2007

Re: stoper1 post# 50654

Saturday, 11/26/2011 4:13:09 PM

Saturday, November 26, 2011 4:13:09 PM

Post# of 60937

I guess I just want some actual proof rather than reading court fillings, which in no way are fact,



The court filings include the source documents. You can read the history yourself. Also court filings have to be honest representations of facts or it is the attorney's butt. I believe that is part of the reason the company no longer has representation in the California case, because they got in hot water for all the factual inaccuracies in their filings.

And no, my outrage with Turrini is very real.

As for why more isn't out yet, you just need to think about that a little to figure out why the company would not want to release facts about the lack of moral turpitude of its star (and only) witness in the state case. Does not take a genius to put the pieces together.

Turrini is willing to bring down the whole company rather than face the music about his alleged illegal activities. If he were an honest man he would have nothing to hide. But he knows what will happen if everything comes to light so he as to stop the person with the information. He has to force Dave out before the settlement because once it is signed he looses his leverage with the board.

That is my thought on the matter. Now you tell me why it is so important to force Williams out now, before the settlement, if he had nothing to hide or if the settlement is in the best interests of the company. Why not just add Sir H to the Board? If everything was good then there would be no issue with that.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.