InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 79
Posts 4682
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 10/13/2010

Re: None

Tuesday, 11/15/2011 10:04:00 PM

Tuesday, November 15, 2011 10:04:00 PM

Post# of 136065
All this talk of Dilution. My perspective is simple. Can Bravada survive and be profitable as is, right now, today, 15 Nov, without anymore dilution? My answer is absolutely, without a doubt, no brainer of course Bravada can. Next question is the current revenue drivers of Bravada what Danny Alex sees as the future of Bravada and the success of Bravada? No, DA wants to see Bravada a household name and in every mall with multiple revenue drivers competing with the likes of Lulu. He wants Franchises and private labels that cost more than current revenue. Dilution has been and will continue to be used for expansion.

My hypothetical explanation, say I owned three successful hospitality establishments that were all PROFITABLE and I wanted to open a fourth. Guess what my three profitable businesses would not cover the cost of the new establishment for some time. But I knew I had a winner with my new location and it would take two years of profit to cover the expenses to cover my potential new place. Do I wait for two years of profits to open my new place? My answer is no, I would go to the bank and take out a loan to cover the expense or seek INVESTORS, thus increasing my net assets and turning more profit with my fourth establishment. This is how business grows fast. If I were a public company would I have to, dare I say……………….Dilute shares to raise capital for my EXPANSION thus generating more revenue for all of my establishments as a whole and EXPANDING my company. Does this process of funding for my company make my company a disgrace or a bad business? No it makes me more resourcefull. I am a business person so this is my personal assessment and reasoning for my holdings and continued INVESTING in Bravada. GLTA GO BRAV = IMO

IMO=in my opinion (my personal saftey harbor statement)