nothing behind that dooor but keep knocking we aint going to answer; because nothing is there,
clerical error is all there is.---Texan77
A clerical error is like spelling the word "door" with 3 "o's" or "dooor" like you did. The passages below are not ("aint") simple typos or badly framed sentences. These are carefully constructed sentences that are clear in their meaning.
I don't know who the cryptic "we" or the "dooor" you refer to is, but, I believe that the company is aware of the naked shorting problem. I was just asking why would the company deny what they know. I have my own theories, but, wanted to hear what others thought on this subject. Though, to call it a clerical error is just entirely false when it is clearly not a clerical error. Read these passages for confirmation. Then, if you wish to speculate, please do.
We do not wish to speculate on the size of the “free float” but can categorically state it is not greater than 34 Billion shares of Common Stock; in all likelihood, it is substantially less than that number.
ALLEGATIONS OF NAKED SHORT SELLING OF YOUR COMPANY’S STOCK:
Your Company’s Management is very aware of the numerous allegations of Naked Short Selling, a common complaint from “Penny Stock Bosses”. Despite numerous requests from our stockholders for your Company’s Management to address this issue, we take the view that these allegations of Naked Short Selling are unfounded and that there is absolutely no proof of Naked Short Selling in your Company’s stock. A function of any orderly market is to permit proper “Short Selling” of stocks. Your Company’s Management is unaware of the extent of any (if any) short positions in your Company’s Stock. We are not however, in a position to disprove the allegations of a “Short Position” in your Company’s stock.
AI
