Colorado Goldfields Inc. (fka CGFI)

[M_T_Pockets]

Overandout,
Thank you for your compliment.
I may be welcoming and open, however I am not a mind reader!
Asking me about Burkhard's comment is unreasonable. Now if you are asking my about MY comment regarding that post, as I explained in my last post, my comment about Burk's post was in support of his decision not to walk into a "bait and trap" situation. The piece of the puzzle you don't see is the constant attempts to "trap" and personally attack the moderators on CGFIA's iHUB board.

Regarding the CGFIA merger with AMNP, I also explained that I know nothing more than what HAS BEEN stated on this board.

The merger is, in my opinion, a method to up list. Until the 4Q for AMNP comes out, it is all just a matter of opinion. No one is trying to veil any information in secrecy.
You have your opinion, I have mine, and Burk has his.


You assumed wrongly, that I was trying to hide information from the board. That was and still is incorrect.
You continue to state your opinion, but you start off your post with a question to me. "Really MT?"

My attempt at an explanation and an answer to your question was brushed aside and you continued to assume I had attempted to hide information from the CGFIA board.
You continued your post with:

But if there is support for a public company to be uplisted through the acquisition of another public company it hardly seems like something that one should be shrouded in mystery when it comes to disclosing it to the board. So much else gets shared in the way of DD but for some strange reason the regulatory support for an uplisting through the acquisition of AMNP is something that will be shared with only the "believers" and not the "doubters"!

Even after I explained the meaning of my statement, you ignored it and continued to make it seem like there was some ulterior motive to my comment.
From my explanation you chose to cherry pick the parts of the quotes you used.

Quote:
Lately any statement made by a moderator is immediately attacked as it being "kool-ade" ...... from a group who seem not to have any interest in CGFIA, but only disrupt discussions and sow seeds of discontent.

My statement was:

You are missing my point and jumping to conclusions.
Lately any statement made by a moderator is immediately attacked as it being "kool-ade" or attempts to convince readers to buy, sell, or hold. These attacks have become personal in nature and most definitely vindictive. They are coming from a group who seem not to have any interest in CGFIA, but only disrupt discussions and sow seeds of discontent.

I believe your choices of what to quote have changed the meaning of what I said.

From a simple comment you have built a conspiracy theory that Burk and I are complicit in an attempt to not share information that we have.
Again I state, you have jumped to a conclusion based on a misunderstanding on your part.
I don't know how much clearer I can be than that.

Either you accept MY clarification of MY statement, or you don't. But please do not make it seem as if I am trying to hide anything from this board.
I have never done so, and am not doing so now.

Why do you have such difficulty accepting the explanation you asked for?