foam: and if they really did have a knockout cancer marker, do you think they would be targeting the canine market? LMAO!!! Their website cracked me up...all this talk of a "proven" cancer marker that can be used across all types of cancer, then you go to the data section on their website and get 1 s**t cancer study among 70 dogs or so. What a bunch of jokers. The reason they don't have the UT Anderson papers on the marker's human studies up on their website is because the data sucks. I've seen them on pubmed...go take a look. The papers are ancient and the data sucks, which is why they stopped pursuing the marker before XPNG came along and "licensed" it for nothing.
DISCLAIMER: NEVER ASSUME INFO ON MESSAGE BOARDS TO BE ACCURATE. ALWAYS DO YOUR OWN DUE DILIGENCE. DON'T BUY STOCK BASED ON THIS POST OR ANY OTHER POST. I OWN A LONG POSITION IN THIS STOCK AND THEREFORE I AM BIASED.