InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 82
Posts 4778
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/27/2007

Re: gpo344 post# 14009

Tuesday, 11/08/2011 7:38:22 PM

Tuesday, November 08, 2011 7:38:22 PM

Post# of 80490

Would they have to do another trial on front line patients if they wanted to use a lower dose?



They are certainly not required to do so. If time was no object you would run another Phase II in this population to determine the optimal dose, but I can't believe they would even consider doing that for a moment.

Perhaps they could get away with a flexible dosage regimen - start at 30mg (or even lower) and up the dose if there is inadequate response. The FDA might grumble a bit, but likely they could get away with it. Alternatively they could run a couple of dosage groups in the pivotal trial.

It's worth noting that a few resistant patients had a good response at 5mg in the Phase I, so quite likely there is room for a dose reduction from 45mg in the frontline population. Tolerability is of course key to wide use, so I am sure they will be focused on using the lowest dose that is feasible.

Peter

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.