InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 251706
Next 10
Followers 826
Posts 119567
Boards Moderated 14
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: RockRat post# 130444

Monday, 11/07/2011 3:01:31 PM

Monday, November 07, 2011 3:01:31 PM

Post# of 251706
I would suggest that you’re making something out of almost nothing. The FDA’s draft regs on FoB’s, which are due any day, have to at least be passively endorsed by Congress, which is tantamount to saying that they have to not be undone. Nothing new about that.

I don’t see why an FoB partnership would need to wait for Congressional endorsement. Other companies have already inked FoB partnerships (e.g. Teva-Lonza), so I presume that MNTA can do the same if they are able to reach an agreement with a prospective partner on the profit split from such an endeavor.

This disconnect has me discounting any excitement folks are hearing when CW talks about the FoB program, as if something substantial there is imminent.

On this narrow point, I concur. As previously posted (#msg-68743455), today’s CC does not signal anything in particular, IMO. Regards, Dew

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.