Monday, November 07, 2011 2:28:48 PM
For example; FLRE need money, yet someone affiliated with them (3rd party) paid a hype firm $22,500 to generate volume. What benefit did that bring? Liquidity in the stock? Yes. But who sold the shares into that "liquidity", driving the price from 6 cents down to 1 cent, where it currently languishes? Did FLRE benefit from the $22,500 expenditure? Did the liquidity get them financing (financing being defined as cash in hand, not a factoring deal) for production? I'd rather see $22,500 paid to Seatex as a deposit on manufacturing. Who is JD VENTURE GROUP and if they have a disposable $22,500, why not lend it FLRE for production? Did they have stock and sell it into the liquidity they paid for? Someone drove the stock down to a penny (post reverse).
"The profiles are a service of Access Media Network Corp.(AMNC) a marketing and advertising firm that may have been compensated and owns the Wall Streets Hottest Stock Newsletter. All direct and third party compensation received will be disclosed within each individual alert in accordance with section 17(b) of the nineteen thirty three SecuritiesAct. Any compensation constitutes a conflict of interest as to our ability to remain objective in our communication regarding the profiled companies.
AMNC has been compensated,Twenty Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars cash by a third party, JD Venture Group LLC. for the advertisement of Flameret Inc. (FLRE). AMNC does not own any shares of FLRE.
AMNC has not investigated the background of the Third Party. Anyone viewing this newsletter should assume the Third Party or affiliates of the third party own shares of the company mentioned which they plan to liquidate, further understanding that the liquidation of those shares may or may not negatively impact the share price."
Another example; has anyone addressed the increase in float from 52,000 shares to 79 million shares in 90 days? In addition to putting out news about the filing of three trademark applications, how about adding in a paragraph about the dilution long term shareholders have incurred, and where they additional 78 plus million shares came from? Amazing how I ask this question and am labeled a "basher". Are another 78 million shares coming into the float short term due to conversions of preferred stock?
North Bay Resources Announces Assays up to 5 oz/ton Gold, 1.5 oz/ton Platinum, 0.5 oz/ton Palladium, and 0.5 oz/ton Rhodium at Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Oct 4, 2024 9:15 AM
Basanite, Inc. Appoints Ali Manav as Interim Chief Executive Officer • BASA • Oct 3, 2024 9:15 AM
Integrated Ventures Announces Launch of MedWell Facilities, LLC and Lease Agreement with Giant Fitness Clubs • INTV • Oct 3, 2024 8:45 AM
Beyond the Horizon: Innovative Drug Combinations Offer New Hope for Alzheimer's and More • NVS • Oct 3, 2024 8:45 AM
SMX and FinGo Enter Into Collaboration Mandate to Develop a Joint 'Physical to Digital' Platform Service To Enhance Natural Rubber Industry's Ability to Report on Sustainable and Ethical Supply Chains • SMX • Oct 3, 2024 7:00 AM
Transforming Alzheimer's Treatment: Innovative Combinations to Boost Cognition • PFE • Oct 2, 2024 9:00 AM