Sunday, July 03, 2005 10:54:19 AM
Anyway, Donnerk posted it in light of the settlement snowball effect. Virgin, then all the others come to the table. GREAT if it happens. I do understand the 'no fault' issues and do not take exception. I do understand the litigation cost issues as well. I simply cautioned that such is always not the case and referenced the IDCC - NOK problem set. IDCC did settle with ERICY, but NOK continues to fight tooth and nail [EXCEPT there is on 1 July 05 an arbitors rulinjg favoring IDCC :) ] IF we get them all to sign on the bottom line and send in a check, ABSOLUTELY NO PROBLEM - and I would agree with virtually all you said. I suppose I'm fromk Missouri and can only say, "SHOW ME."
Thanx for clarifying your comments.
Snowblow5
North Bay Resources Announces First Gold Concentrate at Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Assays 12 oz/ton Gold, 17.5 oz/ton Platinum, and 8 oz./ton Silver, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Aug 22, 2024 10:28 AM
All Things Mobile Analytic, Inc. Reports Major Growth with Over $11 Million in Revenue • ATMH • Aug 22, 2024 7:19 AM
Unitronix Announces Strategic Entry into Cryptocurrency Space • UTRX • Aug 21, 2024 10:00 AM
Mawson Finland Provides Update on Exploration Activities at Rajapalot • MFL • Aug 21, 2024 9:06 AM
Avant Technologies to Implement Robust Cybersecurity Measures for AI-Driven Healthcare Solutions • AVAI • Aug 21, 2024 8:00 AM
HealthLynked Corp. Announces Second Quarter and First Half 2024 Results: Continued Cost Reductions Set the Stage for Strategic Shift to App-Based Technology Services • HLYK • Aug 16, 2024 8:00 AM