I have no recollection of the previous discussion, but 2 points of dispute.
1) It is certainly possible that A & W (is that a root beer?) infringed in obtaining the ANDA, in which case the direct chain still exists.
2) SNY did not launch until after Amphastar claimed they had been selling. So the decision by SNY was clearly after the Amphastar admitted (potential) infringement, and after they stated they had already significantly reduced the price.
I am not saying I would win this argument, but I do like my chances.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.