InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 1973
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/08/2011

Re: fink post# 10949

Friday, 10/28/2011 5:48:49 PM

Friday, October 28, 2011 5:48:49 PM

Post# of 23971
That check was only one and not what,dozens???? When Tom wrote that check then he left for Florida to get paid by James At James's invitation. James came up with a lawyer with a GMAIL account for Tom to get paid in New Jersey.

Tom being from PA right next to NJ, why would James have him drive all the way to Jacksonville? Why not just send him to NJ?

It does not take that long to see through this for everyone is it?

When I heard that, I told Tom that he had been scammed. That is when the background check was ordered.

Lets look at all of that time line. Yes it was a mistake trusting James and I am sure Tom will not do something like that again,

HOWEVER!!, James seems even after having been charged in the past with fraud among other related charges has not stopped him from continuing the same practice.

That is the difference. Tom Trusted James to pay him, Mineseeker trusted James to pay them, Mineseeker got the bad check, Tom, because of believing in James he wrote a check that was to be good by that Monday. But, as we all know, James did come through again with his word.

So, with all the facts out there, would I take a check from James, NO WAY. Tom not even a question. Why? Because I know Tom is not waiting on monies from James.


Peace,

CS12

Everything I state is of my own opinion based on my own research and is not meant for anyone to use for buying or selling anything!

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.