InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 552
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/09/2003

Re: frogdreaming post# 28735

Wednesday, 06/29/2005 6:12:14 PM

Wednesday, June 29, 2005 6:12:14 PM

Post# of 82595
Hi Frog: I recall you had stated in the past that you had or had participated in some patents. Did you perchance have the "final rejection letter" mailed from the patent examiners affecting your applications in any of those cases?

I would think the final rejections are not a many splendored thing when you have so much effort and money involved in the process. And of course not knowing the circumstances that caused the Patent Office actions, I can't begin to guess how much angst was warranted.

I haven't read the Dutton Report, but the comments by others here seem to indicate that they, "Dutton" considered the Patent Application(s) lost with no chance for further process. I wasn't at the stockholder meeting so I can't comment on Doctor Frudakis's comments or emotions. I still don't know if his comment was answering the Dutton report or the Patent Office Letters. In one case it would appear to be a fair reaction as to Dutton misunderstanding the process, and possibly Dutton not even knowing the particulars of the final rejections.

On the other hand I guess some people would like to make a case for a deliberate and malicious lie, told to shareholders so Doctor Frudakis and DNAP could rake more coins from the depleted piggy banks of us widows and orphans. Of course he would be making his statement in the light of the questioner being aware of the lettrs of rejection announced by the Patent Office and announced on the web site. I would imagine if the intent was to mislead the shareholders, (and all the other entities DNAP is doing business with), he might have been better talking about DNAPS involvement in cold fusion or or anti-gravity. It's scary when people seem to take things the wrong way. I hope no one is seeking a class action suit against DNAP based on these comments. Of course I guess if you hired a sharp lawyer he would claim it was "part of a pattern of ongoing behavior" but then DNAP has always had those disclaimers on all the communications from the company.

I can tell you are very concerned with this. Your postings seem so, well anxious.

Stakddek